Vendors · Compare

Vendor comparison

Side-by-side fit, performance, and contract terms.

Dead FlowersDecor & FloralsGarland & CoDecor & FloralsSalt Floral StudioDecor & Florals
3 of 4 vendors · 2 minimum
Dead Flowers
Decor & Florals
AMER

Rating

4.1/5(14)

YTD spend

$4.2M

All-time spend

$11.8M

Active engagements

3

Total engagements

47

Volume tier

Tier 2

Expected discount

12%

Quote discount

7%(-5 vs expected)

Risk flags

1 · Delivery timing — 2 of last 5 events

Master agreement

MSA

Payment terms

Net-30

Exclusivity

No
Garland & Co
Decor & Florals
AMER

Rating

4.4/5(9)

YTD spend

$720K

All-time spend

$2.4M

Active engagements

1

Total engagements

11

Volume tier

Tier 1

Expected discount

6%

Quote discount

6%

Risk flags

None

Master agreement

SOW-only

Payment terms

Net-30

Exclusivity

No
Salt Floral Studio
Decor & Florals
AMER

Rating

4.2/5(7)

YTD spend

$285K

All-time spend

$590K

Active engagements

0

Total engagements

7

Volume tier

Tier 1

Expected discount

4%

Quote discount

5%(+1 vs expected)

Risk flags

None

Master agreement

none

Payment terms

Net-30

Exclusivity

No
Best fit summary

Dead Flowers ranks first across this set — largest YTD spend and highest volume tier — pricing leverage already established. Rating 4.1/5, 47 total engagements, YTD spend $4.2M.

Salt Floral Studio falls last — no master agreement in place — every engagement is a one-off SOW negotiation. Rating 4.2/5, 7 engagements, contract on none basis.

Heads-up only. Producer makes the call — Playbook flags, doesn't fix.